Strengths and some cautions when ‘doing phenomenology’

I’ve been writing up my methodology and findings from a pilot study, but alongside the traditional academic form I’ve been taken with using Sway recently to develop my thinking and ‘mull over’ data collection in the phenomenological sense.

The hermeneutic circle is a metaphor for understanding and interpretation, which is viewed as a movement between parts (data) and whole (evolving understanding of the phenomenon), each giving meaning to the other such that understanding is circular and iterative (Ajjawi and Higgs, 2007). In doing phenomenological analysis I engage with interview data using the hermeneutic circle, transcripts and dialogue with research participants to facilitate a process of interpretation that will lead to a fusion of horizons as understanding takes place. The approach is now one that I take more widely in my work and extend to other areas, finding the movement between the whole and the parts allows me to make connections with the literature, take back to lived experiences and vice versa.

‘Doing phenomenology’ to examine teacher’s lived experiences of physical computing
“Researchers search for essentials, invariant structure (or essence) or the central underlying meaning of the experience and emphasise the intentionality of consciousness where experiences …
Go to this Sway

Header image by Pavel Danilyuk @pexels

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s